Contact

• CICAT2025
• CIRCVOL
• ROBINS
• UPCE

Ingstrup, M. B., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Adlin, N. (2020). When institutional logics meet: Alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners. Industrial Marketing Management.

Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2018). Creating value in the circular economy: A structured multiple-case analysis of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 988-1000.

Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2018). Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 70-82.

Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Ritala, P. (2017). Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 23-36.

Jaakkola, E., Helkkula, A., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2015). Service experience co-creation: conceptualization, implications, and future research directions. Journal of Service Management.

Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Sandberg, B., & Lehtimäki, T. (2014). Networks for the commercialization of innovations: A review of how divergent network actors contribute. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 365-381.

Sandberg, B., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2014). What makes it so difficult? A systematic review on barriers to radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1293-1305.

Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2012). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15-26.

 Co-Editor of the Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism  

Management accounting and control:

Laine, T., Korhonen, T., Suomala, P. (2020). The dynamics of repairing multi-project control practice: a project governance viewpoint . International Journal of Project Management.

Stormi, K. T., Laine, T., & Korhonen, T. (2019). Agile performance measurement system development: an answer to the need for adaptability?. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 15(2), 231-256. 

Laine, T., Korhonen, T., Suomala, P., & Tervala, E. (2017). New Product Development Project Managers as Actors: The Viewpoint of Management Accounting and Control. In A Philosophy of Management Accounting (pp. 117-133). Routledge. 

Tervala, E., Laine, T., Korhonen, T., & Suomala, P. (2017). The role of financial control in new product development: empirical insights into project managers’ experiences. Journal of Management Control, 28(1), 81-106. 

Laine, T., Korhonen, T., Suomala, P., & Rantamaa, A. (2016). Boundary subjects and boundary objects in accounting fact construction and communication. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(3), 303-329. 

Korhonen, T., Laine, T., & Martinsuo, M. (2014). Management control of project portfolio uncertainty: A managerial role perspective. Project Management Journal, 45(1), 21-37.  

Rantamaa, A., Laine, T., & Korhonen, T. (2014). Accounting prototypes supporting product development: integrating different actors’ viewpoints. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 4(1), 3-13. 

Korhonen, T., Laine, T., & Suomala, P. (2013). Understanding performance measurement dynamism: a case study. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 35-58. 

New product development management and decision-making: 

Mämmelä, J., Korhonen, T., Juuti, T., & Julkunen, P. (2019). Communicating design knowledge to support technology management in the manufacturing industry. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 9(1), 4-16. 

Korhonen, T., Laine, T., Lyly-Yrjänäinen, J., & Suomala, P. (2016). Innovation for multiproject management: the case of component commonality. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 130-143.  

Laine, T., Korhonen, T., & Martinsuo, M. (2016). Managing program impacts in new product development: An exploratory case study on overcoming uncertainties. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 717-733. 

Korhonen, T. (2014). Performance measurement dynamism in product development. Doctoral thesis, Tampere University of Technology, 1218. 

Martinsuo, M., Korhonen, T., & Laine, T. (2014). Identifying, framing and managing uncertainties in project portfolios. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 732-746. 

Pragmatic constructivist methodology:

Korhonen, T., Selos, E., Laine, T. and Suomala, P. (2020). Exploring the programmability of management accounting work for increasing automation: an interventionist case study . Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, E-publication ahead of print.

Korhonen, T., Ahopelto, T., Laine, T., Ruusuvuori, J., & Tiitinen, S. (2020). Perspectives to management language games and social interaction in self-managing organizations. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 10(1), 3-10.

Jakobsen, M., Korhonen, T., & Laine, T. (2020). Editorial: How can we understand language games?. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 10(1), 1-2.

Jakobsen, M., Korhonen, T., & Laine, T. (2019). Editorial: Seeing beyond social “bubbles” by the help of pragmatic constructivism. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 9(1), 1-3. 

Jakobsen, M., Korhonen, T., & Laine, T. (2018). Editorial: Special Issue on digitalization and the actor’s perspective, VIII Actor Reality Construction Conference. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 8(1), 1-3. 

Jakobsen, M., Korhonen, T., & Laine, T. (2017). Editorial: Pragmatic Constructivism for making a difference in organizations. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 7(1), 3-3. 

Service management:

Stormi, K., Lindholm, A., Laine, T., & Korhonen, T. (2019). RFM customer analysis for product-oriented services and service business development: an interventionist case study of two machinery manufacturers. Journal of Management and Governance, 1-31.  

Korhonen, T., Stormi, K., Laine, T., & Liew, A. (2016). Examining technical and behavioural possibilities in developing fleet services in the machinery manufacturing context. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 6(1), 3-13. 

Public management and investments: 

Lindholm, A., Korhonen, T., Laine, T., & Suomala, P. (2019). Engaging the economic facts and valuations underlying value for money in public procurement. Public Money & Management, 39(3), 216-223.  

• EBITDA-Environmental and circular Business Impacts from value-chains: Tools for profitability and Desirability Analyses

• Thakuri, P. K., Alkki, L., & Aarikka‐Stenroos, L. (2024). Digital Technologies Enabling Component Reuse in Circular Value Chains: Using Digital Twin, Internet of Things and Robots in Construction and Manufacturing Sectors. R&D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12744.
• Thakuri, P. K., Tiitola, V., Laine, T., & Korhonen, T. (2024). How do Ecologic Sustainability and Business Feasibility Fit Together?–A Pragmatic Constructivist Study. Journal of Pragmatic Constructivism, 14(1), 63-76. https://tidsskrift.dk/JouPraCon/article/view/153052. 
• Thakuri, P. (2022). The Why(s) and How(s) of Demonstrating Value Generating Mechanism. In M. Tkaczyk, & J. Lyly-Yrjänäinen (Eds.), Select Graduate Papers 2021 (Vol. 1). Tampere University. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-2331-8.