AT categorization is traditionally based on technological complexity, ranging from low-tech to mid-tech to high-tech.
However, based on the literature review in the BERT, there are at least six ways to categorize:
1.Complexity
- Low‑tech ATs are simple non‑electronic tools, mid‑tech ATs provide basic electronic support, and high‑tech ATs offer advanced digital solutions that deliver greater functionality but often require specialized training.
2.Functionality
- ATs in this category are based on specific functionality, such as communication, mobility, learning and educational support, hearing, vision, and cognitive assistance.
3.Target group
- ATs can be targeted to specific groups, such as students with visual, hearing, mobility impairments, learning disabilities (difficulty), or multiple impairments or disabilities.
4.Implementation context
- The implementation context categorizes ATs by where and how technologies are used, whether in classrooms, homes, or hybrid learning environments.
5.Socio-economic accessibility
- Categorization by socio-economic accessibility is based on affordability and availability across different socio-economic levels, emphasizing the cost of ATs and the ability to access them.
6.Stakeholder involvement
- Stakeholder involvement highlights the roles of different groups in the development, distribution, support, and use of assistive technologies.
